|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/18/2007 Posts: 736
|
I have read My Two Cents Blog and am intrigued by the conversations. They go back and forth between whether the FOHPP really has the money they claim to have raised and how they actually raised it. Now that all is supposedly said and done, I especially wonder why there is no reference to this great accomplishment on their website. It's all over the news, but nowhere to be found on their website. The latest News statement on their site is from May of 2009. I am also greatly curious as to where their largest and newer donations came from (besides the obvious). If this is in the works to go through, I can only hope that the residents can get some solid information. Note: These are intended to be thought provoking questions and not to entice a combative atmosphere.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/24/2007 Posts: 3,955 Location: Tosa
|
TosaII wrote:I have read My Two Cents Blog and am intrigued by the conversations. They go back and forth between whether the FOHPP really has the money they claim to have raised and how they actually raised it. Now that all is supposedly said and done, I especially wonder why there is no reference to this great accomplishment on their website. It's all over the news, but nowhere to be found on their website. The latest News statement on their site is from May of 2009. I am also greatly curious as to where their largest and newer donations came from (besides the obvious). If this is in the works to go through, I can only hope that the residents can get some solid information. Note: These are intended to be thought provoking questions and not to entice a combative atmosphere. It seems to me you are calling for more endless speculation. They have held their cards close to the chest from the beginning and you don't like it. They appear to be working closely with the county, and their legal documents have been appropriately filed. It's the same old flap you all had last time, with nothing new added. What kind of conversation do you expect to have?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/22/2007 Posts: 149 Location: Tosa
|
Am I the only one who does not know what this topic is about?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/24/2007 Posts: 3,955 Location: Tosa
|
seinatra wrote:Am I the only one who does not know what this topic is about? The Hoyt Park Pool has been abandoned for a number of years. A group of interested people, the Friends of Hoyt Park Pool, began an effort to create a public-private partnership to develop funds to rebuild the pool and restore the pool house as a sort of coffeehouse. The County (Scott Walker and company) are on board, and a wealthy former Tosa couple gave the project start up money. They've been fundraising for a couple years and appear now to be in a position to move forward. Some of us are excited about this wonderful opportunity. Others are concerned that it will cost taxpayer money, create too much noise and traffic in the area, or draw "undesirable elements." So those who don't want it spend a lot of time complaining that they don't have enough information about the project or that the FOHPP are spending too great a portion of the contributions on administrative costs, or whatever. Anyone go to Monday's meeting? What happened when this report/whatever it was about going ahead was made?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/18/2007 Posts: 736
|
Tine wrote:
It seems to me you are calling for more endless speculation. They have held their cards close to the chest from the beginning and you don't like it. They appear to be working closely with the county, and their legal documents have been appropriately filed.
It's the same old flap you all had last time, with nothing new added. What kind of conversation do you expect to have?
Actually, I am trying to end the speculation and gather facts. Now that they state that they have raised the money they need, many folks would like to see a list of the larger donors, similar to what other groups do when they design and display a list of who contributed to the cause. I am insulted that you are name calling it as the same old flap, but understand that it looks somewhat similar, since the discussion revolves around the FOHPP being open to the public by sharing info. Previous discussions called out the problems the old pool and neighboring residents had during it's last few years of being open. I am not dredging that back up. Maybe we are willing to just move forward and learn about what companies backed this plan with their money.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/5/2007 Posts: 649 Location: Wauwatosa
|
Tine wrote:The Hoyt Park Pool has been abandoned for a number of years. A group of interested people, the Friends of Hoyt Park Pool, began an effort to create a public-private partnership to develop funds to rebuild the pool and restore the pool house as a sort of coffeehouse. The County (Scott Walker and company) are on board, and a wealthy former Tosa couple gave the project start up money. They've been fundraising for a couple years and appear now to be in a position to move forward.
Some of us are excited about this wonderful opportunity. Others are concerned that it will cost taxpayer money, create too much noise and traffic in the area, or draw "undesirable elements."
So those who don't want it spend a lot of time complaining that they don't have enough information about the project or that the FOHPP are spending too great a portion of the contributions on administrative costs, or whatever.
Anyone go to Monday's meeting? What happened when this report/whatever it was about going ahead was made? I love a good pool debate  Strangely it's not even on the published agenda for Monday night's meeting. There are only 6 items and the pool isn't one of them. No minutes published yet... Something that is supposed to be good for the community shouldn't be done in such a back door fashion. It's sort of like the UWM thing, where you just feel you don't have the whole picture...and there's usually a reason for that. Even that stupid upgrade with the football stadium had a little more facts around it. Did we start making money from that yet??? Unfortunately, it is what it is, I don't think the "pool people" really care whether the residents want it or not. If you want to see what it's going to be like, take a tour of the one at Lincoln Park in Glendale. It's right on the border of Whitefish Bay...well just take a look, you'll see what I mean.
...I'm not here to make things better, only to observe and pass judgement.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/10/2007 Posts: 600 Location: Wauwatosa
|
Congratulations to the FOHPP. As a long time resident and visitor to Hoyt pool while I was growing up, I am glad to see the group is moving forward. Now my grandchildren will have the same opportunities that I had while growing up in Wauwatosa. I do not think it is important to know who the contributors to the fund raising are. The funds raised allow the group to proceed. That seems to be all that we need to know.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/10/2007 Posts: 600 Location: Wauwatosa
|
Item 6 on the published Plan Commission agenda was for the conditional use for the pool.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/5/2007 Posts: 649 Location: Wauwatosa
|
oldtimer wrote:Congratulations to the FOHPP. As a long time resident and visitor to Hoyt pool while I was growing up, I am glad to see the group is moving forward. Now my grandchildren will have the same opportunities that I had while growing up in Wauwatosa. I do not think it is important to know who the contributors to the fund raising are. The funds raised allow the group to proceed. That seems to be all that we need to know. Ignorance is bliss and it's not the same as when you were growing up and it's foolish to think that. I hope you the best, but a little self defense training for the grandkids would probably not be a bad idea.
...I'm not here to make things better, only to observe and pass judgement.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/24/2007 Posts: 3,955 Location: Tosa
|
JiveTurkey wrote:I love a good pool debate  Strangely it's not even on the published agenda for Monday night's meeting. There are only 6 items and the pool isn't one of them. No minutes published yet... Something that is supposed to be good for the community shouldn't be done in such a back door fashion. It's sort of like the UWM thing, where you just feel you don't have the whole picture...and there's usually a reason for that. Even that stupid upgrade with the football stadium had a little more facts around it. Did we start making money from that yet??? Unfortunately, it is what it is, I don't think the "pool people" really care whether the residents want it or not. If you want to see what it's going to be like, take a tour of the one at Lincoln Park in Glendale. It's right on the border of Whitefish Bay...well just take a look, you'll see what I mean. I don't know what was on the agenda handed out Monday because I wasn't there, but it was clearly on the agenda for Monday published the previous week. I remember thinking it was going to be quite a meeting with both the UWM Innovation Park AND HP. The Hoyt Park plans have been very well publicized and available for a long time, with no significant changes or modifications, unlike the UWM ones which have been evolving rapidly and were not pinned down until just recently. I'm not sure what you mean by "start making money." For "us" to make money from these venues, we'd have to own and operate them for a profit. I think that's a great idea but if I suggested it everyone would be screaming "socialism." There are public activities and endeavors that are undertaken for the common good, like parks and schools. They add to the health and wellbeing of a community and make it an attractive place to live and, if maintained and managed properly, add to the property values. Your suggestion that it's going to be like Lincoln Park is pretty baseless. When you say "it's next to Whitefish Bay," are you implying that poor people and people of color shouldn't be expected to come close to that hallowed ground? If not, what are you suggesting?
|
|
Rank: Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/31/2009 Posts: 16 Location: East Tosa
|
I'd like to know why it is so important to have a list of donors? Do we suspect that the Mafia is making a big contribution, or what? I don't understand.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/5/2007 Posts: 649 Location: Wauwatosa
|
Tine wrote:I don't know what was on the agenda handed out Monday because I wasn't there, but it was clearly on the agenda for Monday published the previous week. I remember thinking it was going to be quite a meeting with both the UWM Innovation Park AND HP.
The Hoyt Park plans have been very well publicized and available for a long time, with no significant changes or modifications, unlike the UWM ones which have been evolving rapidly and were not pinned down until just recently.
I'm not sure what you mean by "start making money." For "us" to make money from these venues, we'd have to own and operate them for a profit. I think that's a great idea but if I suggested it everyone would be screaming "socialism." There are public activities and endeavors that are undertaken for the common good, like parks and schools. They add to the health and wellbeing of a community and make it an attractive place to live and, if maintained and managed properly, add to the property values.
Your suggestion that it's going to be like Lincoln Park is pretty baseless. When you say "it's next to Whitefish Bay," are you implying that poor people and people of color shouldn't be expected to come close to that hallowed ground? If not, what are you suggesting? I missed the agenda item and stand corrected. You know...I was going to reply to your comments, and then thought, I really don't care. My kids are out of the Tosa school system, I can move any time I want to and I will probably anyway regardless within the next 5 years (don't need such a big house). I can put up with it a few years. And if everyone is right about the pool, my house should sell pretty easy and at a good price.... My comment about Lincoln Park had different reasoning than you proposed and I want to make sure it wasn't misinterpreted. I work really close to there and at lunch time would run through there quite frequently. It was not the same after the pool. It wasn't this really nice drink the koolaid family pool atmosphere, but rather tons of unruly kids without any parents there spilling out into the park and surrounding streets. I can't remember how many times I saw cop cars there. I finally stopped running that way and went a different direction during the summer. I'm sure the people who organized that project had the best intentions too. I'm just going to stick to fun topics...
...I'm not here to make things better, only to observe and pass judgement.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/5/2007 Posts: 649 Location: Wauwatosa
|
Puzzler wrote:I'd like to know why it is so important to have a list of donors? Do we suspect that the Mafia is making a big contribution, or what? I don't understand. Nice try Denise... ....I couldn't help myself with that
...I'm not here to make things better, only to observe and pass judgement.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/12/2007 Posts: 128 Location: Mid-Tosa
|
JiveTurkey wrote:Puzzler wrote:I'd like to know why it is so important to have a list of donors? Do we suspect that the Mafia is making a big contribution, or what? I don't understand. Nice try Denise... ....I couldn't help myself with that Now that is funny....Denise wouldn't be caught dead out here in the open. As we have already seen she doesn't do well in unstructured debate dealing with the "real" world. Thats why she took her toys and went home and why her organization keeps the website so well updated. All I can say now is lets hope they prove me wrong. I don't want to get the opportunity to come back here in a couple of months, years, whatever and have to say: "I told you so!"Tosa doesn't need that kind of press!
"Today you have 100% of your life left"
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/18/2007 Posts: 736
|
Puzzler wrote:I'd like to know why it is so important to have a list of donors? Do we suspect that the Mafia is making a big contribution, or what? I don't understand. The list of donors is important because certain donors receive certain benefits. The YMCA is a perfect example if one cares to "swim deeper". Swim clubs can donate and receive priority times for lessons/classes. The Boys and Girls Club can donate and receive free admission for members. Other groups can donate and get benefits to bring busloads of unsupervised or low supervised groups in at negotiated free and reduced prices. Families and residents who pay the premium price to attend or belong to the facility are joined along with those who are admitted free because of the donorship group. I am not saying that it is a disadvantage in the scheme of things, but all of these situations can take away from the RESORT type atmosphere that is promoted and advertised by the FOHPP. One man's resort is another man's Motel 6. Once busloads take over the pool, few families care to take part. This was very evident during the last few years that the Hoyt Pool was open. NO one from the neighborhood cared to swim there, because the pool was over run by large groups of kids that had free admission or were brought in by unsupervised daycare facilities. Kids soon became bored with the pool and spilled out into the neighborhood. Who donated? Can we ask or be informed?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/24/2007 Posts: 3,955 Location: Tosa
|
badgerintx wrote: Now that is funny....Denise wouldn't be caught dead out here in the open. As we have already seen she doesn't do well in unstructured debate dealing with the "real" world. Thats why she took her toys and went home and why her organization keeps the website so well updated.
All I can say now is lets hope they prove me wrong. I don't want to get the opportunity to come back here in a couple of months, years, whatever and have to say:
"I told you so!"
Tosa doesn't need that kind of press!
I have no idea what you are talking about. It looks like Denise and the FOHPP sat down at their kitchen tables and got busy soliciting donations. Prove you wrong about what? Bad press like this or this? How is that bad press?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/24/2007 Posts: 3,955 Location: Tosa
|
TosaII wrote:Puzzler wrote:I'd like to know why it is so important to have a list of donors? Do we suspect that the Mafia is making a big contribution, or what? I don't understand. The list of donors is important because certain donors receive certain benefits. The YMCA is a perfect example if one cares to "swim deeper". Swim clubs can donate and receive priority times for lessons/classes. The Boys and Girls Club can donate and receive free admission for members. Other groups can donate and get benefits to bring busloads of unsupervised or low supervised groups in at negotiated free and reduced prices. Families and residents who pay the premium price to attend or belong to the facility are joined along with those who are admitted free because of the donorship group. I am not saying that it is a disadvantage in the scheme of things, but all of these situations can take away from the RESORT type atmosphere that is promoted and advertised by the FOHPP. One man's resort is another man's Motel 6. Once busloads take over the pool, few families care to take part. This was very evident during the last few years that the Hoyt Pool was open. NO one from the neighborhood cared to swim there, because the pool was over run by large groups of kids that had free admission or were brought in by unsupervised daycare facilities. Kids soon became bored with the pool and spilled out into the neighborhood. Who donated? Can we ask or be informed? You are the only person I'm aware of who's calling this a "resort." Which certainly makes me think you are being disingenuous in your claim that you are being impartial. And you are conflating donors with other kinds of subscribers. Most people who donate to charitable causes don't get a discounted rate: they get a tax write off. So you are really asking for two things: what groups will be actively participating in the pool at group rates, and who has donated money. I would be surprised if the first category is established. The second category of names will probably be released in an annual report document. I certainly understand why you'd be concerned about poorly supervised kids, but I think that can be taken care of by how the pool is run. But the stuff about kids brought by unsupervised daycare facilities and those kids spilling out into the neighborhood does not ring true at all. It sounds like a story you created to explain unsupervised kids. If you want to get the names shouldn't you ask the FOHPP? Surely you don't expect to get an answer here. And be willing to compensate them for their time in photocopying and faxing and such, because I'm sure you are really interested and aren't just trying to be a nuisance.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/5/2007 Posts: 649 Location: Wauwatosa
|
Tine wrote:I certainly understand why you'd be concerned about poorly supervised kids, but I think that can be taken care of by how the pool is run. But the stuff about kids brought by unsupervised daycare facilities and those kids spilling out into the neighborhood does not ring true at all. It sounds like a story you created to explain unsupervised kids. I know I said I would shut up, but...but I need to understand the basis of your statements. Did you live by the pool in the last years it was open??? How many times did you walk by it or use it or have your kids bikes stolen by it??? Just because way on the west side of tosa, you never saw any kids spilling out into your neighborhood is not reason to say it wasn't true in the hoyt neighborhood. I did live here and it was a mess, and anyone that was around during that time in the area would agree. Let's hope it gets run right this time, but it doesn't change the fact that when it was open before it was not great for the neighborhood in it's last years. Trying to say how good this is going to be is one thing, don't distort the past in the attempt.
...I'm not here to make things better, only to observe and pass judgement.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/26/2007 Posts: 1,728 Location: eastside tosa
|
I was watching the common council on T.V. last night nd one person had what I think was a great suggestion. There were a lot of complaints about garage and back yard thefts because kids had to walk from North Ave to the pool. Run the bus all the way to the pool. That to me was a great idea, but we have little input on that decision because the county would need to do that .
The dickens you say.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/24/2007 Posts: 3,955 Location: Tosa
|
JiveTurkey wrote:Tine wrote:I certainly understand why you'd be concerned about poorly supervised kids, but I think that can be taken care of by how the pool is run. But the stuff about kids brought by unsupervised daycare facilities and those kids spilling out into the neighborhood does not ring true at all. It sounds like a story you created to explain unsupervised kids. I know I said I would shut up, but...but I need to understand the basis of your statements. Did you live by the pool in the last years it was open??? How many times did you walk by it or use it or have your kids bikes stolen by it??? Just because way on the west side of tosa, you never saw any kids spilling out into your neighborhood is not reason to say it wasn't true in the hoyt neighborhood. I did live here and it was a mess, and anyone that was around during that time in the area would agree. Let's hope it gets run right this time, but it doesn't change the fact that when it was open before it was not great for the neighborhood in it's last years. Trying to say how good this is going to be is one thing, don't distort the past in the attempt. I appreciate your asking for clarification, just as I appreciate your giving me clarification about where YOU were coming from earlier. No, I don't live near the pool. My question wasn't about whether there WERE kids running about doing stuff they shouldn't in places they shouldn't have been. I trust that those of you who have those experiences are reflecting what happened. My question is about the part that claimed those kids were brought in en mass by daycare providers and then not supervised. That interpretation (and don't you agree that's a guess, not actual knowledge?) doesn't make sense. A daycare center might bring kids in but even a negligent one wouldn't let them leave the premises. So the kids remain a problem. But if you want to prevent the problem, you have to know the real source. In my experience with Hoyt, it appeared that some of the kids who were causing problems were kids whose parents dropped them there and left. Some of those parents were working in the gardens up the road. Some of them, who knows? Other kids got there by bike or bus or? The problem IN the pool area seemed to me to come from having too few young kids (lifeguards) in charge of policing the area. There need to be adults there, REAL security guards, and clear rules enforced strongly. As to the spilling out part, I think the people who run the pool, the Tosa police, and the neighbors will have to come up with a plan to deal with that real problem.
|
|
|
Guest |